Talk:Moamer Kasumović

The article is being vandalised by User:Bakir123

edit

The topic of the article (Moamer Kasumović) was born in Montenegro and moved to Bosnia-Herzegovina at age 15. User:Bakir123 says he moved to BiH "very young and is Bosnian" so he removes my input about these facts, not clear why exactly, because they are simply facts.

The topic of the article (Moamer Kasumović) was a Bosnian-Herzegovinian resident, but has returned to his own Montenegro after he was sentenced for statutory rape of a minor, User:Bakir123 keeps changing that "Bosnian-Herzegovinian" to just "Bosnian" for absolutely no reason.

The topic of the article (Moamer Kasumović) was sentenced to gaol for statutory rape, but was allowed to buy out his sentence, because his gaol time was just one year ie within length allowed to pay out to the state and not serve the sentence. The UNICEF most definitely was aware of that, as it happened before they hired him to work for them, and it was public knowledge, but User:Bakir123 keeps saying it was not known because he himself was not aware thereof and removes input repeatedly.

This is by definition vandalism, but I do not feel like getting involved in a war of edits with someone who is obviously malicious and incompetent, I would like someone with long term experience to look into the issue, hopefully revert back to my edits and lock the article. GoddessWrath (talk) 02:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I will add that he is a "Bosnian-Montenegrin" actor and producer as I was not aware that he also holds Montenegrin citizenship. As for the other stuff, well it's just ridiculous to be frank. "Bosnian" is the demonym in the English language, and it is widely used and accepted as one on the English Wikipedia. There is also no information on whether or not UNICEF knew Kasumović was convicted as he worked with them prior to the conviction becoming public. There is even a high probability that he wasn't even charged for statutory rape prior to working with UNICEF. It is only said here that he worked for some youth organizations during 2015 and 2016, well before his conviction became public and anyone getting a chance to find out. There is also not one reliable source to back up your claim of him working alongside UNICEF up to 2021, i.e. after Kasumović was convicted. Even if he did, then again UNICEF couldn't have had that information when it only saw the light of day in 2024. Up until that day, only the court and Kasumović could have known about the charges and ultimate conviction. Bakir123 (talk) 08:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply