Talk:Mitsubishi T-2
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Poopykibble in topic Are there any surviving T-2s, if so change "was" to "is" in the introduction
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does the Mitsubishi F-1 belong in the variants list?
editLooking at the revision history, this seemed to be controversial for some reason.
I would like to discuss including the F-1 in the variants section.
In my opinion, it should. If anyone disagrees, please join.
2001:B011:5C09:14B9:30D6:5D6A:6E7D:490D (talk) 03:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- No, it's a development, not a straight variant. BilCat (talk) 03:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but how do you distinguish between the former and the latter? The F-1 is a direct variant in every sense of the term. It is the exact same airframe, modified for a combat role. It cannot be considered a full derivative because it is not a complete redesign. Even so, derivatives are always listed in the variants section on other Wiki pages. Look at the F-5's page for example. 2001:B011:5C09:1D74:2828:C80D:9FB0:57DF (talk) 07:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Are there any surviving T-2s, if so change "was" to "is" in the introduction
editAre there any surviving T-2s, if so change "was" to "is" in the introduction Poopykibble (talk) 17:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)