Talk:Mitla

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Whsels in topic World Heritage Site

Untitled edit

Added info about how the Spanish "recycled" the old Mixtec/Zapotec buildings to help further conversions (taken from what I read in a Lonely Planet Guide) and I added some of my own photos to better demonstrate some elements. Bobak 04:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Article split edit

Per other sites in Mesoamerica where there is a nearby modern settlement with the same or similar name to the archaeological site, it will be desirable to separate out into two articles - one for the arch. site and the other for the contemporary, living settlement. Hopefully will get around to doing this (as with a few others) soon, but if not anyone is of course welcome to do so (or alternatively, raise objection beforehand).--cjllw | TALK 13:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mitla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mitla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Distance from city of Oaxaca edit

Is it "located 44 km from the city of Oaxaca" like in the 2nd line of the article, or "It is 24 mi (38 km) southeast of Oaxaca city" 2 lines after that? And anyway why do we need to specify the distance twice in the same section? אביהו (talk) 14:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Human habitation for 80,000 years edit

Clearly a mistake. אביהו (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

World Heritage Site edit

This Mitla archaeological site isn't part of the "Prehistoric caves of Yagul and Mitla in the Central Valley of Oaxaca" World Heritage Site. See the map at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1352/multiple=1&unique_number=1693

As I am a newbie here, I don't feel comfortable removing the World Heritage banner in the infobox to the right, without breaking the format. But it should be removed. The focus of the World Heritage Site is on the prehistoric caves in the area, such as Guilá Naquitz. I can write a new page for that.

--Whsels (talk) 18:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply