Talk:Mississippi flood of 1973

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merge proposal

edit

Two recently created (both today!) articles need to be merged; the only issue is the article name. Convention seems to be year trailing and flood singular per Flood of 1851, Great Mississippi Flood of 1927, Great Mississippi and Missouri Rivers Flood of 1993, etc. I suggest "Mississippi Flood of 1973" as the destination. --Kkmurray (talk) 00:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, Merge. I like content of 1973 Mississippi River floods, but I suggest moving everything to Mississippi River Flood of 1973. I like to saw logs! (talk) 07:28, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
The merge has been completed with this article as the merge target. -- Whpq (talk) 15:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mississippi flood of 1973. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply