Talk:Missing stair

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Perhaps this shouldn't be a Wikipedia article edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Frankly, this does not seem notable enough to be on Wikipedia, and this page probably violates WP:NOTDICT. However, due to my strong and idiosyncratic personal convictions, I refuse to delete Wikipedia pages for these reasons, so I just note it here to feel like I've done something. Make of this what you will. Dingolover6969 (talk) 11:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article is a lot more than just a dictionary entry though. —ajf (talk) 12:35, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Respectfully, I have to disagree; the sections of this article are, at time of writing: intro, origins, meaning, usage, see also, & references. Leaving aside intro, see also, & references, the remaining sections are the coining of the phrase, its meaning, and examples of it being used. This is well within the purview of a dictionary and not particularly within the purview of a Wikipedia article unless the term is otherwise notable for some reason. But, ultimately this is a judgement call and you are free to have your own opinion. Dingolover6969 (talk) 13:13, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Photo caption is wrong edit

Latest comment: 16 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It says "A staircase with two missing stairs..." They're not missing at all. They're broken. That inaccuracy doesn't help the article at all. HiLo48 (talk) 00:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic