Talk:Mishihase

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Small amount of copy editing. edit

Ixtli 17:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sushen found in Japanese documents, or Chinese? edit

"The name Sushen, which is rendered 肅愼 but pronounced Mishihase or Ashihase in Japanese, can also be found in Japanese documents." -- I am assuming this is supposed to say that it was found in Chinese documents, where it was pronounced Sushen, whereas the Japanese readings of the same compound were Mishihase and Ashihase. But I'm not sure enough to actually change this. Anyone else think this should say "Chinese"? 24.159.255.29 01:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Japanese read the ethnonym 肅愼 as Shukushin (しゅくしん) when it is used in reference to the people that lived to the north of ancient China and who were famous for their payment of arrows as tribute to the Chinese emperor, but the same characters are read as Mishihase/Mishiwase (みしはせ) or Ashihase/Ashiwase (あしはせ) when used in reference to the tribe that invaded the northeastern parts of Japan in the 7th century CE. Whether "Mishihase"/"Mishiwase" or "Ashihase"/"Ashiwase" is the correct reading is a matter of dispute among Japanese scholars. Ebizur 04:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


They are believed to have spoken a Tungusic language. edit

This should be removed I believe. After reading the stub on the Nivkh People it seems the Nivkh suffered from invading or migrating Tunghu People, thus if the Mishihase/Mishiwase was of the Okhotsk Culture they would have spoken a version of the Nivkh lingustical isolate not a Tungusic language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.138.39 (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mishihase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply