Talk:Mirzapur

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Correct table view edit

Please correct the fallacy in the table view as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utkarshsingh.1992 (talkcontribs) 16:09, 16 November 2013 UTC

Is this a separate city? edit

Census notes down Mirzapur-cum-Vindhyachal as one municipal board. Also, district website has a page on the m.b.: here, which confirms the municipal board name. This page should be merged with the municipal board page. Comments?--GDibyendu (talk) 20:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC). Before the establishment of the town, the area was a dense forest and freely used by various states like Varanasi (A.K.A.:-Benaras), Sakteshgarh, Vijaygarh, Nainagarh (Chunar), Naugarh, Kantit and Rewa for Hunting.. Over the time Mirzapur became a famous trading center of Central India and started trading of cotton, and silk at very large scale. The East India Company named this place as Mirzapur. The meaning of mirzapur literally means “child of the ruler".Reply

File:Mirzapur.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Mirzapur.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mirzapur.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Recent clean up reverted edit

I recently did some clean up, removing some lists of places that are not considered encyclopedic (see WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTGUIDE) and moving the section on time calculation to a less prominent position. Since these changes were reverted without comment I replaced them and hope to start a discussion here about my edits. Jojalozzo 16:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Requests to list only notable sites edit

I placed comments in the tourisn section requesting only notable sites be added. One of these comments was removed without comment and I restored it with a request to discuss it here before further action in the article. Wikipedia is not a directory or a guidebook and the purpose of the article is not to encourage people to visit Mirzapur. Let's keep this article informative without lists of places to go and things to do. Jojalozzo 20:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mirzapur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:08, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply