 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The total peek power provided 1.0105 MW, even if mathematically correct, hasn't any engineering sense. As far as I know it's the result of (4300 panel × 235 Wp/panel) / 1000000 = 1.0105 MW, but 2 digit can better describe the total power of the plant.
So I propose to change 1.0105 MW with 1.01 MWp (adding also p that means peek).
--Palladipeloarancione (talk) 03:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)