Talk:MirCorp
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MirCorp redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Begin clean up edit
This article apparently has been in this shape for some time. It's largely unsourced opinion and editorializing, and it reads as though it was copied and pasted from a newspaper or similar publication. I've tried to delete the more egregious examples of unsourced editorializing. I think the sourcing for much of the opinions, etc., is "out there" somewhere; it would just be easier if the sourcing had been provided at the time the material was inserted in the article. Famspear (talk) 20:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Sabotaged by Americans edit
"yield to the American pressures and deorbit the station"
Americans sabotaging other countries' high tech. No, that never happens, cough Concorde... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.235.33 (talk) 16:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Citation needed tag abuse edit
I never see a article on wikipedia full of this tags. I think the article is not a problem, the problem is people that full the article with those tags. But this kind of practices only show that the way to discredit others work. Not to state that there are no references. Very bad. 2800:370:9C:6760:2164:1304:E16:7ADA (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)