Talk:Miombo

Merge?

If at some future time the article contains really, really much about the genus, one can still unmerge the ecosystem information ro Miombo woodland. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 22:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• No to merge It is absurd and unprecedented to merge a genus article with a geographical article. Ouedbirdwatcher (talk) 22:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Yes and no. The problem relates to the name, as "Miombo" really should redirect to "Brachystegia" (or vice versa), leaving "Miombo woodland" for info on the ecozone. 212.10.68.64 (talk) 02:44, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

thats fine to have a genus redirect for miombo, but that is not a merge. thus you have voted for a redirect for the word miombo and a No vote to the merge.Ouedbirdwatcher (talk) 03:55, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

• I think it would be more clear for a lot of people to name the article : Miombo woodland. Forstbirdo (talk) 15:01, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miombo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041119164501/http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/forests-grasslands-drylands/map-234.html to http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/forests-grasslands-drylands/map-234.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Brachystegia boehmii.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2018 (UTC)