Talk:Minotaure

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Magazines

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Splitting volumes and tables of contents article edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am strongly opposed to splitting this article. All of the relevant information on the journal is best left on one page. Readers can choose for themselves what to read or ignore and what headings or text are of interest to them. Many people would miss or not bother to follow links to find fragmented, miscellaneous bits of information scattered on different pages.

This was a relatively short page with only a few minor edits for two years until it was "made contents more readable" (May 3, 2021) by putting each title on separate, double spaced lines. It is way too long and unnecessarily drown out now. Having each author in bold with a period or semicolon at the end of each title is sufficient to separate contents. I am in favor of reverting the tables of contents text its prior concise format in paragraph form, rather than a double spaced list. WiLaFa (talk) 16:59, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic