Talk:Ministry of Justice (Soviet Union)/GA1
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ryderofpelham123 (talk) 21:34, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
I have taken on reviewing the article and will post a review shortly. Ryderofpelham123 (talk) 21:34, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
GA Assessment edit
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- The article needs to be expanded and corrected for it to be considered for GA. While this article is a good start, and it is very important, it is not GA material. However, I am upgrading this article to B status. Also, more pictures relating to the topic need to be added.
- Pass or Fail:
Ryderofpelham123 (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Reassessment Potential edit
After speaking with the creator and principal editor of this article, I have decided to place this article's GA nomination on hold. Many of the mistakes I cited were not actual mistakes but information I was not familiar with. After the creator/editor of this page has made the appropriate changes, I will reassess this article. Ryderofpelham123 (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks!
- I added two images.
- I havn't found a method to link a translated version of the Russian text, but you could probably translate the text at Google translate.
- All the Russian refs have a English translation of the title.
- Question, those this mean that there are no serious grammer mistakes with the article?
I really like all the revisions you have made to the article. There are no serious grammar errors, so the article looks ready for a reassessment. Ryderofpelham123 (talk) 17:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Final Assessment edit
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Article reflects the sources and adds nothing new
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- I fely that the topic of the article was conveyed well.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article appears neutral - following the sources closely, and not loading the article with undue praise or criticism
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- The new pictures are a great addition to the article.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- The article's revisions came out very well. This article meets GA standards and with a little more work could be a candidate for "A" status.
- Pass or Fail:
Dear TIAYN, as a major contributor to the article, you don't have the right to assess this article. This article is effectively B class and in no way a GA. I am reassessing it as a B class R.Sivanesh ✆ 17:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)