Talk:Minister for Water (New South Wales)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Rotideypoc41352 in topic Requested move 20 April 2023

Requested move 20 April 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. As proposed. No opposition to a move has been raised after a month. There appears to be no firm consensus on the best article title, so this closer has picked one using WP:CONCISE. WP:NOTCURRENTTITLE applies: As this result does not indicate a consensus for the chosen title, anyone who objects to the closer's decision may make another move request at any time...instead of taking the closure to move review. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


– There is no need for a second article on the Lands Minister. The Water Ministry, currently covered in the Lands and Property article, can be expanded to be the focus of the second article. DilatoryRevolution (talk) 05:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 18:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. EggRoll97 (talk) 23:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I disagree with retaining the brackets. I'd prefer to keep the Lands article at "Minister for Lands (New South Wales)" than move it to "Minister for Lands and Property (New South Wales)." That's unnecessarily long and the disambiguation does not add value because there is no article from which to disambiguate it. --DilatoryRevolution (talk) 01:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.