Talk:Mining on the Brendon Hills

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of West Somerset Mineral Railway was copied or moved into Mining on the Brendon Hills with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Brendon Hills was copied or moved into Mining on the Brendon Hills with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

Langham Hill pit name and date edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This record in the Exmoor Historic Environment Record suggests Langham Hill pit was originally called 'Goosemoor Mine' and dates it to 1839 rather than 1866 which we have in the article.— Rod ^talk 14:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic