Talk:Minimum redundancy feature selection
Latest comment: 7 years ago by 2001:67C:1220:9891:74F9:3F44:1EF7:47D1 in topic Broken Links
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Notability edit
Hi - this seems to be about one person or group's approach to feature selection, without any secondary sources to show that it is used by anyone else, or influential, etc.
In addition, the text of the page reads as if it was copy-and-pasted from the intro to an academic article.
Please establish notability or delete. Thanks --mcld (talk) 12:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Attention needed edit
- Expand
- Widen refs to prevent notability problems
- Further explain as my additions may not be entirely descriptively correct - I only added one example, that of genetics and phenotype identification
Chaosdruid (talk) 00:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Broken Links edit
External Links 1 and 3 (http://penglab.janelia.org/) are the same and they are broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:67C:1220:9891:74F9:3F44:1EF7:47D1 (talk) 08:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)