Talk:Ming the Merciless

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2603:300A:102:F960:ADAF:942F:4F19:1DB4 in topic Notability

Fair use rationale for Image:Ming.gif

edit
 

Image:Ming.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

I've gone ahead and made some changes in relation to the "imex" and added some sources. Imex was originally spelled Imax in this article which I also corrected

I've reverted your added "sources." Wikias do not meet WP:RS, while the third one you added was just a repeat of the external link. You may want to study up on WP:CITE to learn more about how to include a reference, as your formatting and placement of those links was also incorrect. AnmaFinotera (talk) 08:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability

edit

I've deleted the "Notability" tag. The character has been around since 1934 and – as indicated in the article – keeps popping up and is currently featured in a TV show. I've created sub-sections to bring that out. (I agree with the other tags.) 70.108.195.185 (talk) 03:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WHERE IS THE MINDLESS HATS OF HIS CAPTIVES OF MING, OF COURSE EVERYONE KNOWS FLASH GODON RESCUED THEM! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:300A:102:F960:ADAF:942F:4F19:1DB4 (talk) 13:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Animated Ming

edit

I've edited the voice actor from Robert to Alan Oppenheimer, as per the Wiki article on the New Flash animated series, and also as it's unlikely that Dr Robert Oppenheimer was the actual voice. I've also removed the Gang of Fourteen nomenclature for the robot army, as it's equally unlikely those particular gentlemen are Mings warriors. VonBlade (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Scientology

edit

Someone speculated on an online forum that Scientology might have been influenced by this character. AThousandYoung (talk) 20:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Family

edit

We know Ming had a daughter. Was there ever a mention of what happened to his wife? Did he usurp the throne, or were his parents royal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.42.60.87 (talk) 05:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The 2013 comic "Merciless: The Rise of Ming" details the character's early life, and gives him a father and a wife. I believe the Arthur Byron Cover novelization of the 1980 film also gives some information on Ming's family (besides Aura). 176.61.97.121 (talk) 12:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ming's "deaths"

edit

I've seen all three serials but only have my own memory to go on. Ming did not die in a crematorium at the end of the first serial. He gave himself to the dragon guarding a secret exit that we'd earlier seen in a cliff-hanger. In the second serial, Flash sees him pass through flames without the slightest damage and declares that Ming must be fireproof. There's no explanation given in the third serial how he survived the end of the second. However, just before the spacecraft crashes into the building Ming's trapped in, one of his minions, who recently changed side, says that there is a way out if Ming can only think of it, "but I don't think he will." My understanding is that this was simply to leave a loophole if they decided to make a fourth serial. JDZeff (talk) 21:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ming the Merciless. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply