Talk:Mines on the first day of the Somme

Article's rating

I've just assessed this article for the WikiProject of Military History. I gave it a B-class, but I strongly suggest to anyone who has enough time for it to call for a GA review. Lord Ics (talk) 16:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

CE

Rm ref details where the source wasn't cited as they had red on, changed headers to rm repetition, separated short and long quotes. Tidied prose.Keith-264 (talk) 08:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

There's [[Template:Infobox military operation]] if you're interested?Keith-264 (talk) 16:56, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Headers map

Tinkered with the headers, rv if preferred and moved the 1916 map lower to the 1916 section. Are there perhaps too many maps and diagrams now? Keith-264 (talk) 07:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mines on the first day of the Somme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141019172709/http://oldbritishnews.com/trip-to-the-somme/ to http://oldbritishnews.com/trip-to-the-somme/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150510184955/http://www.1914-1918.net/tunnelcoyre.htm to http://www.1914-1918.net/tunnelcoyre.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Recent edits

I took the liberty of rewriting the lede so that the information is better organised and hope that nothing has been botched in the process. WikiwiLimeli (talk) 05:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)