Talk:Minerals Resource Rent Tax

Untitled

Subheading: Levy

How often is this page updated? I'm out-of-touch with this topic in the news. Actually I think The News is out of touch with this topic as well.

Under the 'Levy' subheading, I'd like to see a summary for the layman by someone who understands the topic, because after reading that paragraph I was unsure of the effective ($) difference between Gillard's proposal and Rudd's. As is anyone else who reads it with no prior knowledge. A bit of research into the numbers provided by the Big Miners, and Their forecasts, might be necessary for a really worthwhile summary; but then, why bother having this page at all if such a summary is not provided? As it is, this page says 'Hey, I watch the news too' to anyone who reads it. The conscientious public wants to see the bottom line.

How does the importance rating work, and is this article as highly rated as it should be? I know this is an Encyclopaedia and not an Australiapaedia, and I don't know what the precedents are, but the super profits tax was the single most important issue being discussed when I was back home, and the way Australia directs exploitation of its resources will have ramifications for Australia and Asia for centuries to come.

Apologies for any tresspasses against proper 'Talk' format and etiquette, I am not a wikieditor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.169.215.128 (talk) 12:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

This article should be renamed.

The correct title is 'Minerals Resource Rent Tax'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.3.232.28 (talk) 00:53, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

 Done - Shiftchange (talk) 06:16, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Clean Up Tag

Hi all,

I've place a clean-up tag on this article because it previously said BHP supported the RSPT - this is incorrect as detailed by the following article:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/bhp-calls-for-rspt-to-be-scrapped/story-e6frg9df-1225878408197

I corrected it to say BHP "supported" the MRRT but felt the article was well short of where it should be. I'm not even sure if it's correct to say BHP and Rio support the mining tax or just don't oppose it.

Cedars (talk) 22:47, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Made another change to try and resolve the "support"/"don't oppose" issue I raised above. Cedars (talk) 22:57, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Minerals Resource Rent Tax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120227081407/http://www.futuretax.gov.au/content/Content.aspx?doc=FactSheets%2Fresource_tax_regime.htm to http://www.futuretax.gov.au/content/Content.aspx?doc=FactSheets%2Fresource_tax_regime.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100703121517/http://www.miningnewspremium.net/siteincludes/feature_miningsupertax.asp to http://www.miningnewspremium.net/siteincludes/feature_miningsupertax.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)