Talk:Military treatise

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Military treatise article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Military history: Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Propose move edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would propose moving this to "military treatise", which to my mind seems a more natural English title. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 20:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Andreas Philopater, I'd agree that that sounds like a more natural title Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic