Talk:Military of the Falkland Islands

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Maik Stellenberger in topic Radar Systems

Untitled edit

Rename article ? To Falkland Islands Defence Forces - this is more correct.--jrleighton 10:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't think it is very important (move it if you want to). Falkland Islands Defence Forces is already a redirect if you move the page just make sure that Military of the Falkland Islands directs to Falkland Islands Defence Forces insted. However, there is an almost defacto standard that overview miltary pages are at Military of the... titles (see Military of the United States) but there is also precidence for using the proper name (for the UK, for example). As long as there is a redirect, I don't see that it matters (but I may be in a minority of one). Andreww 21:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

There is a cultural difference issue here. In US English, as I understand it, the word "military" is used to mean what in UK English would be "armed forces". The Concise Oxford Dictionary allows such a use to mean only the senior officers of armed forces (as in "Burma has been governed by the military for many years"). The US usage is creeping into UK use (probably as a result of bad practice by pretentious journalists who like to show how cosmopolitan they are), but is not there yet. Wikipedia prefers UK usage on UK topics, and therefore that usage should be preferred here. I shall move unless there are objections. Deipnosophista (talk) 06:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Move edit

This organisation is never called 'Military of the Falkland Islands' by anyone. It's a wiki-invention. Unless there are objections, I will move the article, over the redirect, to British Forces South Atlantic Islands on Sunday 10 January 09. Buckshot06(prof) 18:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

No objections but Sunday is the 11th. Regards, Justin talk 17:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Weak oppose - this is not the name of an organisation, but the title of the article, and is in line with the titles of other articles on similar subjects. --MacRusgail (talk) 17:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Tornado to Typhoon conversion edit

Can someone verify if the typhoon is in service in the Falklands now? It says in the article that it should have been in service from the end of 2007 yet it says the current interceptor is the Tornado. 82.38.116.119 (talk) 16:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

No they haven't been replaced yet. Just checked the RAF Website, it is still F.3. Justin talk 16:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Number of Typhoons edit

Can someone verify the number of Typhoons in service at Mount Pleasant? The dedicated page for the base says there are four. So are there five or only four?! CrackDragon (talk) 07:21, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

There are 4. Justin talk 09:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Definitely 4. The confusion may have arisen because 5 were originally despatched. One was always intended as a "spare" in case there were technical difficulties. The fifth aircraft returned to the UK after all 5 had reached Ascension Island without problems.

Agent0060 17:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Royal Navy warship capability edit

Can anyone make a useful contribution regarding the capabilities of the RN warship(s) on station? According to the HMS York (D98) article, the vessel has a MOD 1 4.5 inch gun, 2 Twin Sea Dart missile launchers (40 missiles) and 2 Phalanx CIWS. Also a Lynx helicopter with anti-ship missiles and anti-submarine torpedoes. By contrast, according to the HMS Portland (F79) article, this vessel has a 4.5 inch gun, 2 quadruple Harpoon missile launchers, 1 Sea Wolf vertical launch system, 2 twin 12.75 inch ASW tubes, 2 30mm AA guns, 2 CIWS (Phalanx?) and Seagnat and DL3 decoy launchers. Also a Merlin helicopter with anti-ship missiles and anti-submarine torpedoes. By my reckoning, that makes HMS Portland more heavily armed than HMS York. A frigate is more heavily armed than a destroyer? Of course, York was commissioned in August 1985 whilst Portland is a little more recent (May 2001). The difference in capabilities seems obvious to me, but I'm not a naval expert. Is Portland more capable/powerful than York? Agent0060 18:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't understand why that's relevant to the article, perhaps it could be a point to say one is more heavily armed but it seems irrelevant to me. G.R. Allison (talk) 09:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
This is an article about British miltary forces on and around the Falkland Islands. The on-station warship is, for the most part, the only thing that changes at intervals. Capabilities are of the essence.

Agent0060 19:51, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

News Article edit

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/falklands-garrison-still-going-strong

Phd8511 (talk) 22:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Most of this is obsolete edit

and not properly referenced.Phd8511 (talk) 15:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Aircraft edit

It's certainly the case that the Tornados are long gone now. Who's responsible for removing unnecessary "Talk".

Why is a C-130 referred to as a C3. And that's out of date anyway. As far as I can see, the C3 designation would be solely for the RAF, so why not refer to it as a C-130H(C3)? And, according to the article "List of active United Kingdom military aircraft" there aren't any C-130H(C3)s anyway. They've all been replaced by the C-130J(C4) and C-130K(C5). Unfortunately, I have no idea whether the aircraft on the Falklands is a J or a K. Does anybody know?

In addition, does anybody know whether the TriStar tanker has been replaced by the RAF Voyager yet? Agent0060 11:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agent0060 (talkcontribs)

Royal Navy edit

It occurs that the Royal Navy destroyer/frigate deployment is getting a bit wordy and unwieldy. If there is a suitable data source, perhaps it could be replaced by a table?Agent0060 12:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agent0060 (talkcontribs)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on Military of the Falkland Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

uneducated edit

if you want to given lousy uneducated info about SAR be my guest.Phd8511 (talk) 12:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Military of the Falkland Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Military of the Falkland Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Military of the Falkland Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:14, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Military of the Falkland Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

New Commander edit

https://britisharmedforcesreview.files.wordpress.com/2020/11/strategic-command-senior-personnel-6.pdf Commodore Jonathan Lett

Arrival of Kosovo security forces edit

The first group of foreign troops to be deployed to the islands with British permission in history by Kosovo. 81.110.70.101 (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Radar Systems edit

Which (Kind of) Radar Systems are placed at the falklands? Maik Stellenberger (talk) 16:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply