Talk:Military history of Armenia
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from Mitanni was copied or moved into Military history of Armenia. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
| Text and/or other creative content from Urartu was copied or moved into Military history of Armenia. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Factual accuracy edit
I tagged the urartu section inasmuch as it is of questionable factual accuracy to claim that Urartu and Armenia are one and the same. The current reading of the article leads one to believe that Urartu up and became Armenia part and parcel. Urartu's military history has no place in a page on Armenia's military history, unless it is seriously being argued that Urartu was one and the same as Armenia, which is dubious to say the least. Thanatosimii 00:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- If data about Urartu is included in History of Armenia, why not include it here also? -- Davo88 00:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Because I contest that data's accuracy as well, as I have been contesting for over a month now. The connection between Urartu and Armenia is not a part and parcel transformation from the one into the other, thus it doesn't belong here any more than Roman legions belong in the military history of great britain. Thanatosimii 04:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- See my answer below. Emperor of Emperors Armenia (talk) 09:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Because I contest that data's accuracy as well, as I have been contesting for over a month now. The connection between Urartu and Armenia is not a part and parcel transformation from the one into the other, thus it doesn't belong here any more than Roman legions belong in the military history of great britain. Thanatosimii 04:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
I requested User:Clevelander to put back the Urartu warriors image in the Military history of Armenia, where the image was with the info. User:Davo88 also requested to add the Urartu section, so we put the image Urartu warriors there also. Ararat arev 22:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Why should we? it says "Military history of Armenia" and urartu is not Armenia. Nareklm 22:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- It is simply incorrect that urartu is not Armenia, Urartu is a direct line of descendance of Armenian history, the first king called the kingdom Nairi, a continuation of the armenian tribal confederations. I would like to revert it back. Emperor of Emperors Armenia (talk) 09:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Armenian archers deadly at 200 meters? edit
In the "Army of Tigranes 2" section, the quoted paragraph says,
"Plutarch wrote that the Armenian archers could kill from 200 meters with their deadly accurate arrows."
Does anyone know exactly in which part of Plutarch's "Lives" this is mentioned?
Sinsigel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.135.177.94 (talk) 11:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- That paragraph is copied verbatim from a website named "armenianhighlander". I found a book which states that it was on "Polybius, p. 236", the book in question is The Kingdom of Armenia, by M. Chahin, but I could not find any information on the many page 236s in the Loeb numeration of Parallel lives, and the lack of book given makes it almost impossible to find, since Plutarch wrote many more books than Lives. As well as the fact that it's not an actual verbatim quote, so I haven't been able to verify it. JirisysKlatoon (talk) 08:52, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Adding a citation needed in the meanwhile. JirisysKlatoon (talk) 23:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Arf logo.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit
|
An image used in this article, File:Arf logo.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 29 March 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Arf logo.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC) |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced content cleanup edit
Content without sources has been tagged with citation needed/unsourced tags. Tags should only be removed when content is sourced. // Timothy :: talk 22:45, 21 May 2023 (UTC)