Talk:Military Provost Staff

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Proposed merger

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't agree at all. It's not just a sub-topic. This corps had an existence in its own right and should remain as a separate article. -- Necrothesp 12:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Firstly, Necrothesp is correct that the MPSC was a corps in its own right - other corps which were amalgamated into the AGC have their own pages, so why shouldn't this? Secondly, the MPS, like the Royal Military Police, has retained its own cap badge, and so retains a degree of individuality from the AGC.

Add topic