Talk:Miley Jab Hum Tum
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 15 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. In addition, they should only briefly summarize the plot; detailed plot descriptions may constitute a derivative work. See Wikipedia's Copyright FAQ. |
The page is poorly written.
editThe page should be rewritten in proper English or it will be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Bobs5 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- It should not be deleted, but the plot has to go. See Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary especially Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary#What summaries aren't --Triwbe (talk) 09:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Someone has deleted information
editThe characters,cast etc. have been deleted.Someone needs to redo this page. Funtime16543 (talk) 13:24, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Fix the plot or delete it
editTitle. Sksharks (talk, contributions) readded the worlds longest plot on Wikipedia on June 28, 2010. So what should we do? One thing for sure, is that we can't leave a holy messed up text plot in the article. Either we would have to shrink it, or we delete that "Plot" section completely. /HeyMid (contributions) 22:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
It is still very big. I wish to delete it but too many editors have contributed but I think no one cares to fix it. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Animated Movie?
editOK who on earth said that there's gonna be an animated movie!? There is no citiation. Funtime16543 (talk) 15:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Possible Sources for Production Information
editI hope this section helps someone add the necessary production details to this article, that way it is not simply a plot summary.
replacement show link and ending date
TRP causes show to go off air
possible reason for air delay, change in season 2 besides TRP, fan pressure for Rati back on
http://www.india-forums.com/tellybuzz/starry-takes/7125-one-real-quality-of-me-has-come-in-samrat-mohit-sehgal.htm
why Nirbhay left
Rati ready to quit as TRP falls
reason for Adhiraj and Suhani departure
secondary link for Adhiraj and Suhani departure
reason for shorter eve teasing track and back to fun track
eve teasing social issues brought into show
audience enjoys freshness and show survives star one purge
first choice for Samrat was Arjun
Mjhtcarfan (talk) 03:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
also, no source, but I have read Sanaya also auditioned for Nupur initially. Mjhtcarfan (talk) 23:39, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Miley Jab Hum Tum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100605074142/http://www.hindustantimes.com/New-faces-to-revamp-popular-show/Article1-552043.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/New-faces-to-revamp-popular-show/Article1-552043.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)