This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mikoyan MiG-27 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When built? edit
Does anyone know when this plane was built?
MiG-27M edit
The quote about the test firing of GSh-6-30А by Kondaurov is nice, but the source should be cited. Jean-Marc Liotier (talk) 12:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
MiG-27K edit
The K was not the final version built. In fact it was built after the MiG-27 without suffixes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRussian1 (talk • contribs) 22:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 edit
Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 16:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Serbia's MiG-27 edit
Serbian air force does not operate MiG-27, and will not be operating it in the future. Serbian air force operates 5 MiG-29 airplanes, that where left operational after the NATO aggression in 1999. These aircrafts where sent to Russian Federation in October 2007 to be repaired. First two of these came back to Serbia in 2008. All the web articles that report of Serbia acquiring MiG-27, including the one quoted as source there come down to this: http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080715/114033759.html which contains an error. It is not MiG-27s that Vladimir Barkovsky was talking about but remaining MiG-29s, which are still being repaired there. By the way, map that shows all the countries that operate MiG-27 also contains an error. Bulgaria is marked red although the obvious intention was to mark Serbia. Vujadin (talk) 12:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
^^By aggression, you mean the war against the dictator Milosovic, a dictator and supporter of ethnic cleansing? Yeah, what bastards those UN forces were... (121.214.198.180 (talk) 00:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC))
Syria edit
As with somebody noted about SERBIA, i wouldnt be so sure that SYRIA operates this aircraft either, from what ive seen and heard they use "MiG-23" ground attack versions, so some proof about this would be in place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.231.217.247 (talk) 01:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
MiG-27 Reportedly Fell in March 2011 Libyan Conflict edit
Are there many MiG-27's in Libya? Was this abcnews story correct? http://abcnews.go.com/International/libya-international-military-coalition-launch-assault-gadhafi-forces/story?id=13174246 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.23.36.220 (talk) 03:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Iran and Cuba edit
Russian book "MiG-27" by V. Markovskiy and I. Prikhodchenko does not confirm, that Iran or Cuba had any MIG-27s. Cuba received only MiG-23BN, while Iran got only ex-Iraqui MIG-23BN. Pibwl ←« 22:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Indian MiG-27ML Retired but Upgraded MIG27 continue to serve after December 29 2017 edit
Multiple sources including the article reference/link talking about Mig27ML retirement also state that Mig27UPG continue to serve in Indian Air Force. Another example [1] MIG27 had avionics by HAL [2] Barath s (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ {{cite web|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/indian-air-force-bids-farewell-to-mig-27-ml-bahadur-1793734%7Ctitle=Indian Air Force Bids Farewell To MiG-27 ML Bahadur|publisher=NDTV|accessdate=30 December 2017}
- ^ {{cite web|url=https://www.livefistdefence.com/2010/07/special-report-story-of-indias-mig-27.html%7Ctitle=SPECIAL REPORT: The Story Of India’s MiG-27 Upgrade|publisher=LiveFistDefence.com=|accessdate=30 December 2017}
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 15:06, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Mig 27 Crashes edit
Mig 27 Crashes are the part of history and people have only Wikipedia as authentic source to come through to see what weather that Aircraft crashed or not so this is the part of operation history and should be listed under operation history. (My remarks, any one can debate, it is not mocking but concerns) Qasee1230 (talk) 23:45, 5 April 2019 (UTC)