Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-105

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 192.222.134.89 in topic MiG 105 is not Spiral

MiG 105 is not Spiral edit

It may be a good idea to split the article, keeping the MiG 105 separate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinegern (talkcontribs) 20:57, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. BOR vehicules should have a separate article as well. They are a different spacecraft.192.222.134.89 (talk) 00:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

a/c name edit

Folks, AFAIK, the aircraft was named just 105, not MiG-105 and the number belongs to the different sequence (internal bureau/ministry number line). --jno 08:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Lifting Body? edit

The article claims that the Dyna Soar was a lifting body while the Mig was not. This is clearly reversed. The odd shape the MiG get's its 'slipper shoe' nick name is from it lifting body design. 162.156.58.165 (talk) 08:59, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

More pictures. edit

There are some pictures of this aircraft and others here https://www.flickr.com/photos/utopiageneral/sets/72157649154459523/?rb=1 Bizzybody (talk) 00:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-105. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply