Talk:Mike Scully/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   This article is well written and is sufficiently compliant with the MoS.

   I made a few minor copy-edits.[1]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All on line references are live

   The article is adequately referenced.

   All references appear to be WP:RS

   All the on-line sources support the cited statements. I assume good faith for off-line sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The article is braod and focussed. It will need contious updates as Scully's career progresses.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   One image used, correctly licensend and captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Well, this is good to go. I am happy to list this as a good article. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

• • Thanks very much! Gran² 22:50, 8 April 2010 (UTC)