Possible circular sources or excessively vague sources; notability is difficult to verify edit

I have an issue with some of the claims made in this page, so I am searching through the sources and removing material I consider unsupported. I hope this is the correct way to go about changing this article. If this is, the article will either be a good candidate for deletion because it will have little to no notable subject matter or I will find that the subject is notable and provide the article the evidence it needs. It will take me a bit of time to do good-faith searches on some of the article's statements, so please be patient and remember that I am not trying to just destroy this article. It will be a bit empty before I start to fill it up again or I will continue to argue for its deletion. Whittledaughn (talk) 02:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Removed pcmagazine as a citation because it provides no evidence that the company had backing from Microsoft. It states that "At least one report says he now has the backing of Microsoft on the server end of his business." and links to here, but the page has no text on the subject. Whittledaughn (talk) 02:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • This empact link provides no information on the umbrella company; I am going to search a bit to see if I can find some information before removing it. Whittledaughn (talk) 02:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mike Pronovost. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply