Talk:Mike Campbell (Pvt) Ltd v Zimbabwe

Latest comment: 12 years ago by 85.210.192.172 in topic Successful seizure of Zim assets in South Africa

Untitled edit

I created the article, with two sections: "Background" and "The Decision." I intend to expand both sections in the coming weeks. Trsg (talk) 00:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

The "undos" made on September 3, 2009 were due to the deletion of a reference after an edit. Other references that referred back to the deleted reference became orphan, and a full original reference had to be introduced in the appropriate place. Trsg (talk) 23:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pvt edit

What does "Pvt" (in the case name) mean? Apokrif (talk) 12:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I believe it just means "private." Trsg (talk) 22:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Statements at Westminster Hall by Benjamin John Freeth edit

These were added to the "Post-Development Decisions" section. Interesting comments, but I don't see how they affect the case or why they constitute a "development." I propose that everything from "Intervention of the Uncle..." until "birthday honors 2010" be deleted. Trsg (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Successful seizure of Zim assets in South Africa edit

Perhaps some mention could be made of the applicants' success in seizing Zimbabwe government assets in South Africa, eg. [1]? - htonl (talk) 23:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well spotted - done 85.210.192.172 (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply