Talk:Mike Campbell (Pvt) Ltd v Zimbabwe
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled edit
I created the article, with two sections: "Background" and "The Decision." I intend to expand both sections in the coming weeks. Trsg (talk) 00:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
The "undos" made on September 3, 2009 were due to the deletion of a reference after an edit. Other references that referred back to the deleted reference became orphan, and a full original reference had to be introduced in the appropriate place. Trsg (talk) 23:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Pvt edit
What does "Pvt" (in the case name) mean? Apokrif (talk) 12:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
I believe it just means "private." Trsg (talk) 22:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Statements at Westminster Hall by Benjamin John Freeth edit
These were added to the "Post-Development Decisions" section. Interesting comments, but I don't see how they affect the case or why they constitute a "development." I propose that everything from "Intervention of the Uncle..." until "birthday honors 2010" be deleted. Trsg (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Successful seizure of Zim assets in South Africa edit
Perhaps some mention could be made of the applicants' success in seizing Zimbabwe government assets in South Africa, eg. [1]? - htonl (talk) 23:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Well spotted - done 85.210.192.172 (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)