Talk:Mike Baxter
Latest comment: 12 years ago by JayJasper in topic Wrong Batting Average
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wrong Batting Average
editI was watching Last Man Standing, and they mentioned Mike Baxter - I looked on WIkipedia, and although it was the wrong Mike Baxter, I noticed that the baseball players career average was off.
Currently it states the following:
Batting average .989
I am not a baseball fan and know little of the game, but even I know that a career average of 0.325 would be impressive. I sort of assume these numbers are feeds from some baseball stat site, but I don't know which one is the best. The link shows his average way below 0.989, but I did not want to correct this for two reasons:
1. I am not an expert on the subject, and 2. There may be a data feed problem (more global problem).
Thanks, Dsmoya31410 (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- The sources cited in the article have the correct batting avg. at .214 - considerably lower than the one you had seen posted!. Someone was probably having a little fun - perhaps seeing how long it would take for someone to spot that. Thanks for catching the obvious inaccuracy and bringing attention to it. The correction has been made.--JayJasper (talk) 07:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)