Talk:Mik Kersten
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 September 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
.
Publications section
editThe Publications section is much too long and detailed. It should be pruned to the really significant ones. I suggest the main author selects up to five total, say, or deletes all of them and points to a fuller list elsewhere instead. At the moment this reads more like a CV rather than an encyclopaedic entry. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:08, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
I just pruned it and commented on the Deletion Thread. Could you take a look to see if this is sufficient and warrants removing the prune banner on that section, or suggest pruning further? Mik Kersten (talk) 17:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
I've removed the Prune tag now that the list of publications has been limited to only the most significant. If further pruning is recommended, please comment. Telmocean (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mik Kersten. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010151917/http://kerstens.org/mik/publications.html to http://kerstens.org/mik/publications.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Updates to reflect Mik Kersten's recent career and removing some outdated info
editHi Wikipedia editors,
This is Rich Miller. I work with Mik Kersten as part of my role doing content for Planview, the company he is the CFO of. This Wikipedia article includes info about the early part of his career, but it is missing information about the last several years of his work. There is also some information that is out of date given that his company Tasktop became part of Planview.
To propose these updates, is the right process for me to use this Talk page to list the additions/changes? Or would you like me to use the Edit Source area to show those to you for review? Thanks for your help mapping out the right approach!
--Rich RichMillerPortland (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Wikipedia editors,
- I hope it's ok that I will go ahead and suggest the updates to Mik Kersten's page based on the notes he provided to me. Per my note above, I work with Mik as part of my role with Planview. And the article about him is missing info about the most recent years of his work. Plus there is outdated info that needs to be correct. I will use the "Edit Source" tab above to make these suggestions...but please let me know if you would like me to do this a different way. Thank you! RichMillerPortland (talk) 23:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)