Talk:Miikka Kiprusoff

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)
Good articleMiikka Kiprusoff has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 19, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Calgary records

edit

"He also broke the Flames' franchise record for most games played in a season when he collected his 40th win of the season against the Minnesota Wild"

this sentence needs to be clarified. he broke the Calgary record for most games played in a season on the same date that he recorded his 40th win of the season? what does the fact that they won, against Minnesota, have to do with the record for games played? wouldn't it be better to say how many games he played to gain that record? OkEric (talk) 06:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

SM-liiga and Elitserien stats

edit

Anyone with his complete stats from the European leagues please update them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legalizeit (talkcontribs) 10:41, 31 August 2004 (UTC)Reply

Mask Picture?

edit

I moved and shrank the mask picture (there was no need for it to be that big, given the size of the article), but I'm kinda curious: does it really need to be there? It strikes me that an action shot, if anything at all, would be more worthwhile. Doogie2K (talk) 23:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I personally like the picture. With only one other picture in the article, I don't see the need to remove that one. -- JamesTeterenko 02:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Off Ice Reputation

edit

"He is a heavy smoker and occasional alcoholic."

What on earth is an occasional alcoholic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.223.61.146 (talk) 17:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Goalie Mask

edit

The recently released McFarlane Toy (Miikka Kiprusoff 2) and his likeness in EA NHL and NHL2K feature a goalie mask that have 2 Calgary Flames logos instead of the flaming skulls on the dome. Is this a licencing issue? Censorship? Any info would be great. Would make for an interesting trivia note. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.87.39.199 (talk) 20:07, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Miikka Kiprusoff/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:  
    In the Calgary Flames section, "Kiprusoff struggled to begin the 2006–07..." I believe there's a word missing after 2006–07, cause right now it reads very odd? In the International career section, this sentence ---> "He stated he will play for Finland at the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver, but only if he feels healthy and if he is the starting goaltender for the team" is outdated.
    Check.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
    In the San Jose Sharks section, "He finished fourth in the league with a 2.48GAA" and "...and posting a 5.65GAA in that time" are spaces needed between 2.48/GAA and 5.65/GAA? Same thing with the latter in the following section and in the International career. Same section, San Jose Sharks, "...for a second round draft pick on November 16, 2003 after Calgary starter Roman Turek suffered an injury" ---> "...for a second round draft pick on November 16, 2003, after Calgary starter Roman Turek suffered an injury", commas after dates, if using MDY. In the Calgary Flames section, "...in a Flames uniform in a 1–0 win over the Wild on March 27, 2007 to break Dan Bouchard's franchise record" ---> "...in a Flames uniform in a 1–0 win over the Wild on March 27, 2007, to break Dan Bouchard's franchise record". Same section, "...He won his 200th career game on March 18, 2009 in a 2–1 victory" ---> "...He won his 200th career game on March 18, 2009, in a 2–1 victory".
    Check.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:  
    In Reference 31, the "Toronto Sun" is supposed to be in the "work" format of the source, as it is a newspaper. Refs. 2, 54, 55, and 56 need accessdates There seems to be a problem with Ref. 47.
    Check.
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):  
    C. It contains no original research:  
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:  
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:  
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

All should be corrected now. I checked and found a couple of other dates where I missed the comma, and the dead reference has been replaced. Thanks! Resolute 21:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
They are, and you're very much welcome for the review, just doing my part. Thank you to Resolute for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Miikka Kiprusoff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Miikka Kiprusoff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miikka Kiprusoff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miikka Kiprusoff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Miikka Kiprusoff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply