Talk:Miguel Henríquez/Archive 1

Comment

...a pirate in the latter part of the 18th century...

In the early years of the 18th century...

The above two bits of info contradict. I don't know which is correct. Reading the article, it appears that the first line should be "early part of the 19th century" and the second part should also be "early years of the 19th century". Everyking 02:57, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

Everyking, you're so right! It was one of my first articles and I don't know how I goofed up. I fixed though, thanks for pointing it out to me. Tony the Marine

npov?

"He showed great valor in intercepting English merchant ships and other ships dedicated to contraband that were infesting the seas of Puerto Rico and the Atlantic Ocean in general."

this strikes me as slightly... slanted. pauli 16:02, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

• Pauli is right, therefore it is taken care of. Tony the Marine 17:21, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

Recheck your sources

According to Arturo Morales Carrión's Historia del Pueblo de Puerto Rico, Capt. Miguel Enríquez wasn't even alive in 1811. The Vieques incident happenned in 1717-18. Please check your sources. We'll get to that in the near future.RAMPG 14:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Recheck your sources

What sources have to say M.E. was a pirate (besides the British, of course)? The quoted link is really a poor one. The best source on M.E. is definitely Ángel López Cantos and seems you ignore it for some internet rehash web page. The info from the reader back in 2006 is correct. Why not edit the Francis Drake entry too? Beats me!!RAMPG (talk) 03:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

• You can edit the Francis Drake entry if you please, but the fact remains, even if you do not agree with me that M.E. was a pirate up until Spain granted him the letter of marque and reprisal which granted him the privileges of privateer. Up until then Spain would look the other way towards his activities and considered a patriot as long as he did not attack any Spanish vessels. Wikipedia policy requires that articles provide reliable "verifiable" internet sources, which has been done. The works of Cantos have also been cited, however, this is a similar case as to what is considered as a terrorist to some maybe considered as a patriot to another. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  • I am seemingly being a pain, but reference #3 is hardly a "verifiable source". I'll look up my Lopez Cantos and Morales Carrión "facts". RAMPG (talk) 07:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  • OK, Tony. I re-read Lopez' book and re-heard his interview in Voces de la Cultura and he states categorically that M.E. was not a pirate. He became a corsair in 1700. I don't like to edit someone else's work out of respect. If you have evidence that contradict Lopez Cantos' I'd love to see it. Otherwise, make justice to the man.RAMPG (talk) 05:08, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

• Ramon, here is the situation, corsair=Privateer in that we agree. Let's say that he became a corsair in 1700, he would have had a letter of marque and reprisal from Spain which granted him the privileges of privateer. All sources indicate that this was done in 1713. However, lets assume that it was in 1700, in order for a country to grant you a letter of marque and reprisal you first had to proof yourself as a worthy patriot who attacked the ships of other nations. In other words you had to be an experienced pirate loyal to your government and since ME intercepted English merchant ships before he was granted the privileges of Privateer, he could be considered a pirate. Even if Lopez Cantos does not use the term "pirata" to describe ME's activities before Spain granted permission to attack and sack other vessels, that is what he was. Piracy is a robbery committed at sea, or sometimes on the shore, without a commission from a sovereign nation. Don't get me wrong, because you know as well as anyone that I admire ME and his loyalty, but I just can not believe that any country would grant the privileges of Privateer, to an inexperienced person who had not participated in piratcy and shown their loyalty. I have to go by sources provided as required by Wikipedia policy, otherwise the article's credability will be questioned and the article maybe subject to deletion. Tony the Marine (talk) 08:04, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Ramon, the "Big" question here is: What did ME do between the time that he was a shoemaker and fought the British in Vieques? Was he a Pirate? Was he a merchant? and if so where and how did he get the financing to become one? Did he serve in the Spanish Navy and if so what rank did he hold? Where and how did this poor mulatto shoemaker of the 18th century get enough money to organize his own fleet? Tell you what, the term Pirate could apply depending upon who considered him as such and therefore be considered point of view, I will modify the article somewhat. Tony the Marine (talk) 23:43, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

• That is a good question. Another question would be where's the evidence for either conclusion? It's not a matter of point of view. Your conjectures are very reasonable but ... have you seen Lopez Cantos' book? It has hundreds of primary source references. Hundreds per chapter no less!! The Wiki article has none and the references cited are not reliable. I cannot understand how would you or anyone looking for the best posible info overlook Lopez Cantos books and go for uncorroborated internet links with no references wahtsoever.RAMPG (talk) 01:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Because Wikipedia policy forbids original research and the sources cited are reliable, but if you can provide the answers to my questions from Canto's book, then we can work sometime out. Jesus Ramon, you are making a big deal over a small issue. Do you realize that I was the first one to ever write about ME in the internet making him known to both Boricuas and non-Boricuas who have never heard of him? Do you know that I have written hundreds of bio's of our Puerto Ricans in English, making the contributions of our people known to millions around the world? So, please stop being so critical and provide me with the evidence. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

• • Sorry. I did not mean to be a pain, as I said. I am not an expert, just trying to get out the best info for all. Not my info, just the best possible from those who know best. I see a lot of people relying on the net for info and some of the stuff you read there is terrible. I recognize your excellent work but sometimes it seems you are too protective about the entries. It's a deal, of course, I will provide evidence for any editing I propose.RAMPG (talk) 02:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
• No harm done, we'll work together. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:51, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

miguel henriquez , corsario puertoriqueño

el era un puertoriqueño ingenio el fue matado no se murio por su cuenta ...porsupuesto que esta no es la in formacion buena pero comoquiera esto te pasa por hacer el trabajo especial de sociales a ultima hora si estas haciendo el trabajo a tiempo perdon pero esque soy puertorriqueña y no pude encontrar la informacion..sorry!!