Talk:Miguel A. Faria Jr.

Pics lacking

Why don't we have a picture of the person in the entry? Thanks. I found this on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=249447473008795&set=pob.100038306324743 Can not this pic be used by an editor or administrator? Thanks.

Notes

I am not an expert at this but it appears after reviewing the entry that possible deletion of this entry may have to do more with politics than notability of this person. I don't share his politics but I do recognize his achievements in medical science. I have also read some of his articles in realclearhistory. For what is worth! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.28.60.176 (talk) 18:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Addition: His "notability" seems to be well established by cursory examination of references 8-12, 21-33, 38-67 where others write about him. Thank you for permitting me to post this comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.28.60.176 (talk) 18:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

I found much info under his full name: Miguel A. Faria, Jr., M.D. to separate him from a famous Brazilian film-maker with similar name. I hope this helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.184.167 (talk) 14:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

I fully agree the "notability" tag should be removed, as Faria has significant notability given the number of newspaper articles about him, his mentioned in several books, and the fact he seems to be a polymath, neurosurgeon, editor, historian, activist, you name it! I also agree that the article could significantly improve with better organization, subheadings, etc. Someone should undertake this and as requested in the second tag, perhaps I will do so later today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.22.125.126 (talk) 13:18, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

As requested by editor, I did "buckets of work" as promised: the article was structured and cleaned up as per Wikipedia standards. i established notability in multiple areas supported by primary as well as respected secondary sources, such as newspaper articles and scholar searches. There might be now too many references. Point of View of article is more neutral from re-structuring, and if readers and editors agree should remove the last tag, unless there are objections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.22.125.126 (talk) 19:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

"Advocacy" of Second Amendment? No. Propagandist of Extremist Views.

I'm a little troubled by this reference "and advocate for the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,[10][11][12]"

The Second Amendment is in no need of any advocacy. The (US) Constitution has indeed been amended, and the Second Amendment is in place. Second.

Doctor Faria seems, rather, to be an advocate for one particular savage, ahistorical, and unwise set of interpretations of that Amendment. One of two of these, but fortunately not the whole farrago, have been adopted by an activist, partisan, and unprincipled set of Supreme Courts nominated by rightwing US Presidents. The result, predictably, has been a slowing in the downward drift of America's home-gun bloodbath.

I think the article should identify Doctor Faria accurately. He is a propagandist for the non-well-regulated ownership of guns, and uses factitious interpretations of the Constitution in that effort.

David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 19:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miguel A. Faria Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.surgicalneurologyint.com/text.asp?2015%2F6%2F1%2F35%2F152733.
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.surgicalneurologyint.com/text.asp?2015%2F6%2F1%2F49%2F154273
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012101005/http://www.surgicalneurologyint.com/text.asp?2011%2F2%2F1%2F161%2F89876 to http://www.surgicalneurologyint.com/text.asp?2011%2F2%2F1%2F161%2F89876

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Miguel A. Faria Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130216045607/http://www.ahcmedia.com/public/products/Medical-Ethics-Advisor.html to http://www.ahcmedia.com/public/products/Medical-Ethics-Advisor.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222140820/http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2011/09/26/faria-obamacare-toward-free-market-or-socialized-medicine/ to http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2011/09/26/faria-obamacare-toward-free-market-or-socialized-medicine/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141216225142/http://www.surgicalneurologyint.com/text.asp?2012%2F3%2F1%2F71%2F97729 to http://www.surgicalneurologyint.com/text.asp?2012%2F3%2F1%2F71%2F97729
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720000718/http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/1/11/142641.shtml to http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/1/11/142641.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)