![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
record
editCurrently this is the only vowel without a record to play. Could sb. please add one? Thanks --Backinstadiums (talk) 21:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Seconded. We need that recording. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 14:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Kbb2@Backinstadiums There is now an audio that somebody has recorded for Wikimedia Commons last year, I added it to the module which fetches the files, making the "IPA: Vowels" chart template now have a complete set of recordings. It does seem to be accurate when compared to sources off of Commons. عُثمان (talk) 23:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Frustrating deletion!
editThis sound occurs in many languages and is worth of addition to the IPA basic table and to warrant it's own article.
If 400+ Jewish feminists get their own articles, I can only see hatred and anti-science pro-religion bias in this particular deletion. 121.45.172.20 (talk) 04:56, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- We've never had separate articles for all of the vowels but only some of them. In addition, many of our readers confuse cardinal vowels with actual vowels in world's languages. There are close-mid vowels that are slightly below close-mid but not as low as to be exactly in-between close-mid and open-mid. Where would you put them? Here or on close-mid back unrounded vowel? Exactly. Less is better in this case. Also see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics#We probably have too many vowel articles. We already cover multiple vowels on open back unrounded vowel and near-open central vowel.
- EDIT: One more thing: nothing's been deleted, the page was just merged with close-mid back unrounded vowel. Your message is largely just a false alarm. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 10:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Creation
editWho create this page? Juidzi (talk) 12:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)