This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Microsoft Band 2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for merging with Microsoft Band on 3 November 2015. The result of the discussion was that there was no consensus to perform the merge. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Merger
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was that there was no consensus to merge Tom29739 [talk] 15:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Oppose I can see how this article can be improved upon, despite being a widely discussed subject on the web it certainly misses some references and sources, but it simply requires more expansion and is different enough to be a notably (see: WP:NOTABLE) different article from Microsoft Band. Sincerely, --86.81.201.94 (talk) 21:17, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
I also oppose the merger. I think the Microsoft Band seemed to be more of a prototype device, whereas the Band 2 is much more generally (and globally) accessible. I think people will be looking specifically for this product and may be confused with the older Band page. The original Microsoft Band does not have a number after it to identify it as the previous version. So you would be merging this new project into the older-named product. I.e. we don't have "Microsoft Band" version 1 and version 2, we have "Microsoft Band" and "Microsoft Band 2". (sorry if I've posted this wrong - I'm new at this) Wandolabs (talk) 04:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)