![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BMJ article
editThe BMJ article corrects mistakes in some of the figures of the original article - have not made these changes. 92.16.193.218 (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
I believe the update has been made. The Dec 2012 errata states that "results for women are incorrect in the table... For each subsequent drink (up to 6),.. the change in microlives per day should have been −1 (not “−½”). For fruit and vegetable intake,.. the change in microlives per day should have been 3 (not “4”)." ( https://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e8676 ) and it looks to me that those changes have indeed been made.Alexgenaud (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
request edit
editThis edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article. |
Please take this page off Wikipedia or replaced with our company information. We've received countless complaint from our customers by misleading them. Here is our company web site. www.microlife.com
Best regards, Frank Chen
- Sorry, but that request cannot be granted.
- We have a process for removing articles - see Wikipedia:Deletion_policy for more information.
- The article does need some work, however, unless I missed something, it doesn't purport to be an article about your ccompany. It appears to be an article about a concept, which happens to have the same name as your company. I understand why some people searching for your company might find this article, but are they truly thinking this article is about your company?--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)