Talk:Mick Fealty

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sionk in topic Delete Article
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mick Fealty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mick Fealty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Delete Article

edit
The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived: Outcome was: redirected

I have proposed that this person (primarily a blogger, it appears) lacks notability, that the text relies on links to primary sources and is linked to by only a small number of consequential pages Billsmith60 (talk) 15:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Tend to agree the article's time may be up. I had a look for secondary sources 6 years ago and couldn't find much. I was going to oppose the PROD and suggest AfD instead, for an article that has been around for so long. But I notice all the claims for notability are repeated for the 'Slugger O'Toole' article - which largely is the winner of the 'awards' - so an alternative would be to redirect Mick Fealty to Slugger O'Toole. If that gets reverted, take it to AfD. Sionk (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
From a procedural point-of-view, the PROD and AfD tags have been somewhat flawed (an AfD with no discussion, a PROD when the incomplete AfD/speedy tags were already removed, etc). From a content and notability point-of-view, the content does seem to largely mirror the Slugger O'Toole article, and the subject's notability seems inextricably linked to the website they created. Personally, per Sionk's suggestion, I think a merge/redirect is probably the most appropriate thing to do here. Guliolopez (talk) 11:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Your two comments seem to lead to a very reasonable way forward, if that can be done? Thanks to you both Billsmith60 (talk) 12:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've gone ahead and blanked and redirected the page to Slugger O'Toole. There wasn't any sourced biographical content that could be merged. Sionk (talk) 21:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply