Talk:Michael Lynch (geneticist)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 December 2014. The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Heidilynnmichael, Emscott3. Peer reviewers: Emscott3, Danielle Adelaide.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
editI am no expert, but I don't think "The Origins of Genome Architecture" is a textbook. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.195.200.161 (talk) 23:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello.. So what's your opinion on the "Tree of life" and "Flower of life" show the metaphorical depictions of the the DNA and the energy we label loosly as a soul. Do you see the complex nature of such evolved mechanics of biological Evolution of these concepts. Just curious Michael Lee Namaste CHAARM (talk) 19:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Emscott3 peer review
editWhat looks good: you have a strong background to begin with; mentioning his alma mater, books he has written, and awards he has written gives a good sense of his accomplishments.
What to expand on: next try adding information on his research and any field studies or journals associated with his findings. In addition, you could consider adding more information on his life and his newer accomplishments (if any) now since the only information available on the page right now is from over 30 years ago Emscott3 (talk) 02:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Sections need removal
editThis article contained promotional unreferenced material. It still does. The sections related to the research should present secondary sources or be removed. Discussions and descriptions of Lynch's primary papers do not belong to BLPs.DeWeerth (talk) 16:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Block evasion
editJust a note that recent unreverted edits by Lelandykes were block evasion by a sockpuppet of Arifer. This would normally be reverted per WP:BE but since it means restoring material where WP:ONUS matters, independent editors should assess what should be restored if anything. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 22:51, 7 November 2021 (UTC)