Talk:Michael Arrington/Archives/2016
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Permstrump in topic Contretemps
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Contretemps
I removed what was in the "Contretemps" section, because the entire thing was undue and poorly sourced and there wasn't anything that could be salvaged because the entire thing violation of WP:BLP.
In March 2009, Wired included Arrington in a flowchart of "internet blowhards".[1]
—Name calling and undue.On the Gillmor Gang on June 6, 2009, Arrington accused Leo Laporte of giving the Palm Pre a good review in return for accepting a 5-day evaluation unit...[2]
—Undue and original research?, this only source for entire paragraph is a Primary source and this section is possible original research.Arrington has been known to advocate dropping out of college...[3][4]
—Primary sources aren't reliable for contentious claims about a BLP, this nothing more than gossp gossip.
—PermStrump(talk) 07:43, 25 October 2016 (UTC)