Talk:Micah Jesse
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | A fact from Micah Jesse appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Notability?
editThe notability of the topic here is pretty marginal. Granted this guy is certainly not a nobody but I would argue there should be more evidence of his notability to merit an article. Most of the references are either obscure or just mention him in passing. --Mcorazao (talk) 17:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Not to mention it's clear he's being self-promotional simply by quoting the minor press he's gotten in other gossip columns. I would edit down the article HEAVILY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.238.25 (talk) 02:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. And it seems to be a pretty clear case of COI editing as well. Drmies (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- I cut it down further, like what grammar school he attended and the article his college paper wrote on him. Can you believe this article once boasted of his achievements on his high school swim team? You don't get a Wikipedia article based on participation. Liz Read! Talk! 04:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Micah Jesse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090914190243/http://www.okmagazine.com/2008/01/today-were-loving-4020/ to http://www.okmagazine.com/2008/01/today-were-loving-4020/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100617170645/http://www.musicchoice.com/Originals/Default.aspx?page=Certified to http://www.musicchoice.com/Originals/Default.aspx?page=Certified
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)