Talk:Metaphysical aesthetics

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 16 September 2019 by reviewer Missvain (talk · contribs).

Philosophy: Aesthetics / Metaphysics / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics
	Metaphysics
	Contemporary philosophy

Where do you start? edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I tried to make the intro readable but there is almost nothing to go on. The idea that we must use concepts that are beyond our own understanding to understand something is plainly ridiculous, but that's exactly what the intro is trying to suggest. The rest of the article is just vague speculations upon the nature of art. There might be something in the concept, I don't know, but I can't find it in the article. Cuthbert Bargepole (talk) 05:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic