Talk:Metaphorical language

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Is it a language? edit

Is language the correct category for this? I cannot find any metaphorical language which is not religious except for the fictional example in ST:TNG. Since that exists, and is at least a conceptually possible language, Religion is not an accurate Cat... Other than that example, also, I can find no metaphorical language which is actually a language instead of a type of religious language subset. KillerChihuahua 16:10, 12 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

In other words, I find no reference of a fully formed metaphorical language outside Science Fiction.
What about Category:Linguistics and Category:Cognitive science|Linguistics?

OR claim edit

Someone removed the OR note, and I am replacing it. The examples given show that complex systems of metaphors exist in real and fictional cultures. But nothing on this page or its references say that there is any such thing as a "metaphorical language" in the complete sense that the article is describing. See the failed AFD discussion for consensus that the article should be kept, but needs to be seriously reworked. Staecker 23:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metaphorical language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply