A version of this article was wikified by a member of WikiProject Wikify. The project welcomes all editors with a good grasp of wiki markup to help improve articles. Visit our project page if you're interested in joining! If you have questions, please ask at our talk page.WikifyWikipedia:WIKITemplate:WikiProject WikifyWikify articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
First paragraph, I deleted "Essentially, they should try to manipulate any discussion to mislead voters through "glittering generalities".", because I don't see why not allowing oneself to be be distracted by questions or parasite thought is equivalent to actively deceiving and manipulating. And the tone used seems suspicious to me. And there is no reference.
And, on the whole, I think this article doesn't respect the Neutral point of view policy.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I think the article could benefit from some examples of preferred terminology as a method of message discipline, i.e. "death tax" vs. "estate tax" or "TW" vs. "trans woman". N8chz (talk) 03:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
