Talk:Mesobatrachia

Latest comment: 12 years ago by JerryFriedman in topic "not matched"

"not matched" edit

I don't understand this:

"This is, of course, not matched to the 5,047 species noted in the Neobatrachia suborder."

Does it mean the number of Mesobatrachians is far smaller than 5,047? I first read it as saying that the two counts were made differently and shouldn't be compared. —JerryFriedman (Talk) 03:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply