This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
So, if the African material is now placed within Libycosaurus, does that mean that L's time range extends into the Pliocene, or not?--Mr Fink (talk) 21:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
There's a range chart in Merycopotamus reference 2 (PDF) that includes Libycosaurus. Based on that chart, it looks like Libycosaurus only makes it into the late Miocene. It may be a situation like Dissopsalis where what was early Pliocene is now late Miocene. --Helioseus (talk) 22:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
