Talk:Merrick Garland/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2021
 | This edit request to Merrick Garland has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can someone please revert this? [[1]] It was properly sourced and...pretty damn important. From the NYT nonetheless. No reason was given for the deletion of reliably-sourced material, which is improper. I don't see how this is a WP:BLP issue. Reliably sourced, notable, fairly neutral tone. Many Wikipedia readers are Americans and the potential weaponization of the PATRIOT Act by their own government against them would be, like, important information for them to know...that's what Wikipedia is about, being an encyclopedia and all. 2600:1012:B00B:8F38:7057:8038:50CC:5043 (talk) 07:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}}template. Edit requests are not for edit warring. Please establish a consensus about this prose. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:47, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Dead beat dad's!!! Politicians and there effects.
1.Where did shame and blame politics come from? 2. How do phycological attacks work? 3. Can anyone "blame and shame" and cause these satisfacted effects? 4. Can a person in such a high level position be hung by the United Nations for an attack on the American public with this "weapon of mass destruction"? 173.219.33.98 (talk) 10:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Strong arm law!
Was that because black fathers could not find work due to racism? I do not believe the caricature of the lawyer nor the dignity of the court was represented. I would like to address this in federal court. 173.219.33.117 (talk) 20:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
No mention of Mar-a- Lago?
Zero mention of Mar-a-Lago search on Trumps documents? Eruditess (talk) 21:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Unprecedented
The article incorrectly says that the senate delaying his hearing was unprecedented. However the majority of the time this situation has arisen in the past the same thing was done. This incorrect and biased word needs to be removed and replaced with a reference to the other situations which set the precedent that was followed in his case. 2001:5B0:2842:DDB8:420:1503:5841:FC4F (talk) 22:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
NOT the President's "personal attorney"!!!
Garland is Attorney General. His client is the United States, and NOT Joe Biden, except in his ceremonial role as head of the government of the United States. Shame on whoever allowed the edit claiming otherwise. 98.45.240.11 (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)