 | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 January 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
blogspot souce edit
Hello all,
I received a warning when making some edits to the page regarding blogspot as a cited source. While I would normally agree that blogs are not good source material the site in question was written by UBeam's former Chief Technology Officer and provides some excellent inside information regarding the innerworkings and news about UBeam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:F901:C900:428D:5CFF:FEB0:F473 (talk) 18:32, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Controversy edit
This page should really address Meredith's controversial statements on engineering. In her TED talk, she explicitly defamed the entire field and made overall unrealistic claims about energy transmission. It is evident her claims were unfounded and scientifically unsound, having wasted millions towards the (unfulfilled) energy transmission promise. An unassuming reader of Wikipedia reaching the current page would end up with a biased self-promoted/vanity picture of this person.
GNG edit
She appears to meet GNG. And aren't the WP:ABOUTSELF usable for info about her age and career and stuff? Andre🚐 23:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Correct. WikiEditor020575 (talk) 20:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)