This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Against - as proposed. There's a case for reorganising the various articles on "armed merchantmen". There's a difference between raiders and those that were equipped for defence or deterrence, wg, MACs, CAMs, DEMS, etc. Folks at 137 (talk) 20:44, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
If this is still open, I’m
Against;
A summary paragraph at Armed Merchantmen is quite appropriate, with a link to a main article at Merchant raider. Xyl 54 (talk) 15:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
PS there’s been no response to this for a long time, so I’m removing the tags. Xyl 54 (talk) 15:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
