Talk:Melbourne City FC NPL
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
_in_Australia.png)
.svg){kind=logo}
Different from NYL team edit
As specified on the Melbourne City website, the NPL team is distinctly different to the NYL team. The squad, kit and coach are different while City has also created official separate social media pages for the NPL team. Thus I have created another page just for the City NPL team named Melbourne City FC NPL. http://www.melbournecityfc.com.au/article/draft-npl1-announcement/10toy4tbofvq2zray8ulbc0km - Millsy29— Preceding unsigned comment added by Millsy29 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC+9)
Non-free use of File:Melbourne City FC Logo (2014–).png edit
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
This image does not have the separate, specific non-free use rationale it needs according to WP:NFCC#10c to be used in this particular article. Therefore, it may be removed per WP:NFCCE. Normally, all that is needed is to add the appropriate nfur to the file's page so that all 10 of the WP:NFCCP are satisfied. It's not clear, however, if the same image is being used for the NPL and NYL teams. If they are not connected at all, then an image specific to each team and supported by an appropriate non-free rationale should be used. If they are affiliated in any way, then No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI may apply. No. 17 basically says that non-free logos of parent organizations cannot be used in the articles of child organizations and then non-free logos specific to the child organizations are to be used instead. So, if one is considered to be the "parent" of the other, then I don't believe the image can be used in the article of the "child" organization. - Marchjuly (talk) 05:07, 8 June 2015 (UTC)