Talk:Melanopsamma

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Biblioklept in topic Misinformation

Misinformation edit

Noticed that there were over a dozen species that were repeats of other entries (and not specified as a specific variety of the species), so I took those out, but even so, the page states that there are 41 species in the Melanopsamma genus when there are over 100 species listed. Normally I would just assume this mistake occurred because people were adding species to the list without updating the total number of species, but given how many other mistakes there were in this section, it's possible that this page is simply full of misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biblioklept (talkcontribs) 21:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Melanopsamma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply